So, you’re bulking, huh? You’re going to gain 8 pounds of muscle this summer? You’re going to gain a pound per week, for the entire year? Ok, good. Have fun. This post isn’t for you.
Or maybe it is. By all means, do all of those things. But when they don’t work out exactly as you had planned, come back and read this article. I’m not saying you can’t bulk up, but there is a huge information gap. Most people that try to “bulk up”, myself included, end up gaining a bunch of weight, mostly fat, then “cutting”, and ending up either at the same size as they originally were, or only a few pounds heavier. It is incredibly frustrating. But it doesn’t have to be.
Yes, I’ve been there. I’ve tried it the hard way. I had a blast, gaining 34.6 pounds in 6 months. It wasn’t all muscle. Yes, I was getting stronger. But I still weighed 198 pounds, while benching 200 pounds. It was not impressive at all, and yet, when I did it, I thought I was he-man or something. I just assumed that all my weight was muscle, disregarding the larger waist as a side effect of “having large obliques” or something ridiculous. Not that people don’t get thicker waists from heavy lifting and a strong core, but they don’t gain 4 inches on them in 6 months.
I know, it sounds like I was just completely blissful. But be careful; turning a bulk into an obesity transformation it isn’t as hard as it seems. Most of my fat was not flopping around in the wind; I didn’t look like a bowl of jello. Yet, had I continued down the path of gaining weight at that rate, things could’ve gotten ugly.
If I pinched my stomach, it was still pretty hard, so I figured I was good. My waist was expanding, and so were my legs, but like I said, I was able to fool myself that it was muscle.
As soon as I started cutting, I realized what was going on. No, I wasn’t jiggling like jello, but there was fat being lost. It was under my muscles; literally under and inside my muscles, in what is called intramuscular fat. “Intramuscular fat or Intramuscular triglycerides (IMTG) is located throughout skeletal and is responsible for the marbling seen in certain cuts of beef.” Then, on top of that, there was the “Visceral fat or abdominal fat[6] also known as organ fat or intra-abdominal fat, [which] is located inside the abdominal cavity packed between the organs (stomach, liver, intestines, kidneys, etc)”.
When I cut down, I dropped weight like a rock, going down to 176 before I knew it. Even then, I was a bit chubbier than I had been at 164. Going from 198 to 176 took about 4 months, the entire journey from 164 to 176 around 10 months. Then, lets assume that I had 4 extra pounds of fat at 176 than I had at 164, so I had really only gained 8 pounds of muscle in 10 months. That is a gain, but it was very slow. Now, looking back, if I had just stayed lean, and slowly added pounds without trying to gain as much weight as possible, I could have avoided the whole chubby phase, and quite likely would have gained more muscle during those 10 months.
This leads me to my first point about bulking up. Remember to consider the composition of the weight you are gaining. Sure, I may have gained 36 pounds, but how much of it was muscle?
I know you are going to disregard that last point when you are a novice; just remember that I warned you. If you are anything like me, you are/were convinced that you simply couldn’t gain weight at all, and were determined to do so just to prove that you could. That is perfectly natural. Go wild. But be aware that there is a better way: slow bulking.
The Chicken or the Egg?
Before we get to slow bulking, I want you to consider the chicken-or-egg dilemma I have been wrestling with for the past few years: if you want to put on muscle mass, do you up your lifting or your eating first? I’ll admit, during my “bulk”, I was convinced that the eating had to go up first. Now, I’m not so sure.
For some reason, bodybuilding culture (read: bodybuilding magazine culture) is enamored with the idea that bodybuilding is mostly nutrition, and lifting comes secondary. That is incredibly wrong. Does that mean that I can start eating like a professional bodybuilder, and will soon look like him? No. Goodness no. I’d have to be lifting the same weights he is. If not, I would just turn into a blob (which is exactly what I did).
Therefore, my second point is this: up your lifting first, then let your eating catch up. Muscles are like engines to move your body. If you just put more gas in them, and they don’t need it, they’ll just keep it in the tank. Eventually, the tank will be full, and you’ll have to put another tank in if you want to keep storing gas. However, if you make the engine bigger, it needs more gas to run. Then, you can add that gas, and you won’t have to get another tank. Now, substitute the word ‘muscles’ for ‘engine’ and the word ‘stomach/fat stores’ for ‘tank’, and you’ll see where I’m coming from.
Building the engine
Now you may be wondering, how can you build this engine? Well, simply, do more volume. Do more sets, do more reps, or any combination thereof, and you will grow. No, I don’t know if it is better to do 100 x 10 x 10 (pounds x reps x sets) = 100 total reps with 100 pounds = 10,000 pounds tonnage, or to do 150 x 5 x 10 = 50 total reps with 150 pounds = 7,500 pounds tonnage. But what I do know is that increasing tonnage is good. Doing more, within your limits, is good. Besides, this is a beginner’s post. At this point, you should stop worrying about all of that, and just go lift and pay your dues.
Before you get all excited, if you are a beginner, take some time to learn the form for the movements. Have someone teach it to you. Watch videos of how to do it on youtube. Make sure you do lots of lower-back and ab work to get a solid base. Don’t jump into deadlifting right away. Work on your rows, work on chinups, work on your incline pressing strength (incline presses require much less form than flat bench presses). Gradually add in complicated lifts like deadlifts, bench press, and cleans. At this point, the goal is to focus on ingraining proper form of these lifts by practicing them as much as possible. Paul Carter outlines a solid beginner program that he used to add 7 pounds of muscle on his 13 year old daughter in his wonderfully candid and straight to the point masterpiece book, Strength-Life-Legacy. I would outline it here, but don’t want to steal his stuff.However, the book and his blog are definitely worth checking out for a non-corrupt, non-anabolic drug look at lifting.
There are millions of programs out there, and most of them work. Yet people get so confused over which ones are better, and get overwhelmed by choice. Well, if you must do one of these, just pick one. It doesn’t really matter which one you pick. 5 x 5, 5/3/1, 10 x 10, traditional bodybuilding split, Pavel’s bear program, DeLorme method, Chaos and Pain, the Lift-Run-Bang program, whatever. They will all work. All you have to do is do them, and do them consistently. If you continue to do increase your total tonnage (weight x reps), your muscles will want to grow. Then, boom, you’ll start to get hungry, and you’ll gain weight, almost effortlessly (well, the eating part of it will be effortless).
Now, I know you’re still worried about how many days a week to lift, and which program is best, and so on and so forth. Well, I have good news and bad news for you. The bad news is that I don’t know which program is best for you, and the good news is also that I don’t know which program is best for you. All of these programs with predetermined rest days and set and rep numbers will work, but you need to realize what they are: cookie-cutter programs. They are very conservative, and will work for just about anyone. As Jamie Lewis likes to say, they are low risk, low reward. They are relatively low in terms of volume, to make sure you won’t get hurt, and are relatively simple, so everyone can do them. But they are probably selling you short of your potential.
It isn’t that there is anything inherently wrong with these programs. They just don’t take into account individual differences, especially the recovery ability of new lifters. Yes, I know what you are thinking: “I’d have to take steroids to lift more than 3 or 4 days a week.” I was under that same impression for years, brainwashed by people like Stuart McRobert, the pessimistic author of Brawn, who created routines entirely based off of making sure that you don’t overtax your frail body. That makes me sad, and thank goodness it isn’t necessary. How in the world would we have survived as a species if we couldn’t recover and adapt to extreme exercise?
I’m about to say something bold, and you don’t have to try it. But you’re going to anyway, because it is great and works. If you are a beginner (any of your lifts are less than these: 1.25x bodyweight bench, 1.5x bodyweight squat, 2x bodyweight deadlift), start lifting 6 days a week. With such light weights, you can’t really do that much damage anyways. 2 days squatting, 2 days benching, 2 days pulling. Don’t go to failure every set. Just put in volume. You can either do lots of low rep sets (10 sets of 3) with heavy weights, or less high rep sets (5 sets of 8). Heck, you can do anything you want, just do lots of it, okay?
Six days a week is not the end-all-be-all split, even for beginners. But try it. Start with a lot, and if you find that it is too much for you, do less. Stop underselling yourself by default. Grind it out.
Food
This, like lifting, is a personal thing. However, there are a few things that must remain constant. Firstly, base your diet around protein. If you are lifting consistently, get a lot of protein. It isn’t going to hurt you. If you don’t believe me, read Dietary Protein and Resistance Exercise, by Lonnie Lowery, PhD, RD then tell me I’m wrong. As for how much protein, use 1g/lb bodyweight as a target. But more than that won’t hurt either. Protein must remain high, no matter what.
The variables in your diet will be carbohydrates and fats. I’m not going to rehash what has already been written millions of times about how much to get, because everyone seems to have their own opinion. However, what I will say is this: if you want to gain weight, add more carbs and fats. If you want to lose it, cut carbs first.
No, I don’t support no carb diets, because I don’t think they work long-term. If you do weekly carb-ups, that can work, however. I personally like to cycle my carbs. On rest days (or light(er) workout days), I’ll have high protein, high fat, low carb. On lifting (heavier days), I’ll have high protein, high carb, low fat. If you want a more thorough explanation of why that works, read Anthony Mychal’s article here.
Meal timing? I don’t think it matters much. That 3 hour rule, where you’re muscles will evaporate if you don’t eat every 3 hours, is not real. It really takes around 24 hours, so go out and have a good time, stop carrying your chicken around, weirdo (or maybe that is just me). I’ve become enamored with intermittent fasting lately, and have found that it is pretty easy to both lose and gain weight on it, without ever getting chubby. Read more about that on leangains.com.
In summary:
-remember to consider the composition of the weight you are gaining
-up your lifting first, then let your eating catch up
- do more volume; increasing tonnage is good
-learn the form for the movements
-base your diet around protein
Learn from people better than you. Ask their advice, read their articles. Worry about getting your lifts up before you worry about eating 6,000 calories per day. Learn the movements. Do more volume. Put in work, and reap the rewards.
Works Cited:
“Visceral Fat.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 08 Mar. 2012. Web. 07 Aug. 2012. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visceral_fat>.
“Intramuscular Fat.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 30 July 2012. Web. 07 Aug. 2012. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intramuscular_fat>.



Just curious, but why do you recommend a 6 day split for beginners? I would argue a 3 day split works better, but I’m curious as to what your reasoning is.
My reasoning behind it mostly hinges upon the idea that most beginners are significantly undertraining themselves. Bear with me for a minute. As a new lifter, you aren’t lifting anywhere near your potential. Your nervious system is only firing at a fraction of its potential capacity. With such light weights, you probably won’t do much damage. Regardless, these wimpy 3 day a week, minimal volume programs are set up to be easy, low risk, low reward programs. Yes, they do work, but so many guys sell themselves short, and could make much quicker gains by doing more frequent lifting. Even if you don’t want to do compound lifts often, small bodyparts like the arms, forearms, calves, neck, and abs recover very quickly and can be trained multiple times a week; you are probably significantly undertraining them compared to what you could be for maximum results. I’ve also been reading about a lot of guys training upper back every day and having amazing results.
My final word: try training more days per week, even if it is just lighter days to “grease the groove”, and see what happens.
Hmm ok I see why you would say that. However, most people just starting out probably aren’t eating enough to properly compensate for recovery in high-volume programs. What about programs like SS? I would hardly call it wimpy, or low-risk, low-reward with its progressive overload scheme. Granted, other great programs like GST or All Pro’s routines make use of different splits (although GST is not as beginner-friendly). I think one of the things overlooked with 6-day splits is that for new trainees, the amount of CNS / homeostatic disruption occurring with unfamiliar, heavy, compound exercises, the amount of stress the body takes is much greater relative to the trainee than, say, someone who has been lifting for even 3 months. Thoughts?
I kind of alluded to the eating when I say “up your lifting first, then let your eating catch up” in the “The Chicken or the Egg” section; I think that if you start lifting more, you’re eating will take care of yourself. You don’t need to start eating 5,000 calories per day before you go crazy in the gym; it will happen on its own.
I think it is totally wimpy. Yes, it is hard, but it is still three days per week. I don’t think it is the quickest way to either get strong or to get big. Based on the idea that practicing a lift (DOING IT) more will make you better at it, SS is lacking significantly. 3 x 5 is only 15 total reps, and you’re doing that a few times per week?
I have also read about the CNS disruption with the heavy compound exercises, but I simply refuse to believe that it is significant for beginners that are using relatively light weights. I think programs like 3 x 5 or 5 x 5 will work just fine, but if you are using light weights, you aren’t going to kill your CNS anyways. When it is 500 pounds for reps, its a different story. The way I see it, humans wouldn’t have survived for centuries if they were only able to do strenuous things three times per week. We are adaptable.
If you don’t agree with that, that is totally okay. But here is something to consider. Consider if you did SS, but on the off days, you did the SS lifts, but either lighter or for less reps, but with much more sets to get more total volume. If you did this, you would get much more practice with the lifts, making you much better at them, making you stronger quicker.
Agreed that starting by trying to eat 5,000/day is ridiculous; I don’t think many great strength training coaches would advocate jumping to such a high number to start off. I think it was a good write-up, but it’s also kind of directed at something of a strawman of proper dirty-bulking. I don’t see where the logical step exists between practicing an exercise more often at a lower weight makes you gain strength.
Ultimately, under the SS program, if you’re able to squat on an off day, it means you *probably* didn’t squat hard enough the day before. Heck, you should be pretty damn sore after a ~3sets ramping warm-up and then 3×5 (presumably at what has now become your 5RM after around week 4 of the program). The other problem with adding in additional light weights on those off days is that it will either A.) prevent the principles of progressive overload from being fully brought to fruition or, B.) create a situation that places the trainee in danger of falling victim to overtraining (option B being predicated upon diet, other activities, etc.)
I agree, using light weights won’t kill your CNS. However, it will significantly affect your recovery for lifting heavy weights on the days that truly matter. Those extra lighter weights additionally affect your total energy consumption, and if you’re a beginner, you’re going to want to maximize the amount of calories going towards strength and hypertrophic gains whilst minimizing fat gains.
I’m glad you brought up the evolutionary / adaptability point. I think that is an incredibly important thing to keep in mind. However, I do think most of these routines that involve lighter weights and higher volume are geared more towards intermediate-advanced bodybuilders, powerlifters, etc. (obviously depending upon the routine).
I think I guess my biggest question is how can you assert that a chain occurs whereby
Practicing lift more often -> Faster strength gains ?
I think I would assert a different cause and effect, where practicing a lift more often leads to a greater likelyhood of solidifying the form of that lift (which is fantastic assuming the form being practiced is proper).
Let me know your thoughts, bro. This convo is good.
Haha yeah 5,000 is a bit silly for most guys; i was just exaggerating my point a little bit. What do you mean directed as a strawman of dirty bulking? And sorry to write it so ambiguously before; what I meant was that if you practice a heavy weight for lots of reps, or a light weight for even more reps, you will get stronger at the lift because of neural adaptations.
I see exactly what you are saying with the overtraining on the SS. I Felt that way for a long time too. However, I started reading Jamie Lewis’ blog a few months ago, and he has converted me to high-volume training. I was skeptical at first, but it has worked well for me since I started it. Here are some articles that deal with this subject. Pardon their language. After reading them, let me know what your conclusions are.
http://chaosandpain.blogspot.com/2009/03/chaos-and-pain-basics.html
http://chaosandpain.blogspot.com/2009/09/chaos-and-pain-for-new-jacks.html
http://chaosandpain.blogspot.com/2009/12/10-reasons-stuart-mcrobert-can-go-fuck.html
http://chaosandpain.blogspot.com/2010/02/if-you-still-think-high-volume-training.html
http://chaosandpain.blogspot.com/2010/05/youre-overtrained-huh-its-all-in-your.html
http://chaosandpain.blogspot.com/2010/05/overtraining-part-2.html
These mostly sum up my thoughts, in much more eloquent and scientific fashion. Are there any uncertainties after reading them?